Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Tanksley v. CDC et al
as 3:2009cv01981
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
Defendant:
CDC, Salinas Valley State Prison, Mary Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanksley v. CDC et al
as 2:2009cv01133
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
Defendant:
CDC, Salinas Valley State Prison, Mary Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Evans et al
as 3:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ernesto S. Martinez
Defendant:
Michael S. Evans, G. A. Neotti, R. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Evans et al
as 3:2008cv04067
Plaintiff:
Russell Martin
Defendant:
M. S. Evans, L. Trexler, C. Warfield and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ernest Cox, Jr. v. Gregory Harris, et al
as 08-16252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST LEE COX, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY HARRIS, L. TREXLER, D. M. DUCKWORTH and others
TREXLER et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67732
Plaintiff:
LEONARD GEORGE TREXLER and ALICE L. TREXLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hall v. Curry et al
as 5:2007cv03580
Petitioner:
Richard Gary Hall
Respondent:
Ben Curry, W. A. Cohen, J. Aboytes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Curry et al
as 5:2007cv03233
Plaintiff:
Richard Gary Hall
Defendant:
Ben Curry, J. C. Sisk, W. A. Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TREXLER et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64462
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. TREXLER and BETTY L. TREXLER
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
