Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Price et al v. LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Harold Price and Patricia A. Price
Defendant:
LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation and Bobby Joe LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lafave, et al v. The County of Fairfax, Virginia, et al
as 1:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY LAFAVE, Glenn M. Taubman and Robert Holzhauer
Defendant:
The County of Fairfax, Virginia, Kevin Davis, Chief of Police and Kevin Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villanueva v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12872
Plaintiff:
Jose Villanueva
Defendant:
Heidi E Washington, Richard D. Russell, Dave Shaver and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
