Cases 1 - 10 of 18
STONE v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2025cv00136
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STONE
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLIE FOX, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JOSEPH MCCUTCHEONS, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Jewell v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 22-1471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JEWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor and others
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERHILL v. RIPPETOE et al
as 1:2020cv02238
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, EMILY KARDIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERHILL v. KARDIS et al
as 1:2019cv04410
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, EMILY KARDIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03722
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, LAURA BODKIN and PAUL A. TALBOT
Plaintiff:
STEVE ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY-EL v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv03138
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, V. SHEPHERD, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01880
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMPTON v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2019cv01779
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, V. SHEPHERD and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
