Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Riggle v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv13531
Defendant:
James J Quinn, Lawrence F Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Riggle
Miller v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv13508
Defendant:
James J Quinn, Lawrence F Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Fisher v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv06441
Defendant:
James J. Quinn, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
James Fisher
Creeks v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv10044
Defendant:
James J. Quinn, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline D Creeks
Sabatini v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02028
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
James J. Quinn, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Lasker v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv06036
Defendant:
James J. Quinn, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Lasker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Stein v. Arotech Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02016
Defendant:
James J. Quinn, Lawrence F. Hagenbuch, Arotech Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
GARCIA v. REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01385
Defendant:
DOUGLAS K. AMMERMAN, KARL G. GLASSMAN, LAWRENCE F. HAGENBUCH and others
Plaintiff:
JASON GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
BUSHANSKY v. REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01361
Defendant:
DOUGLAS K. AMMERMAN, KARL G. GLASSMAN, LAWRENCE F. HAGENBUCH and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
PHILLIPS v. REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01343
Defendant:
DOUGLAS K. AMMERMAN, KARL G. GLASSMAN, LAWRENCE F. HAGENBUCH and others
Plaintiff:
MAXINE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
