Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Sabur v. Mahally
as 3:2019cv01693
Petitioner:
Bilal Sabur
Respondent:
Lawrence P. Mahally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Mahally et al
as 1:2019cv01468
Defendant:
Lawrence P Mahally, George Miller, Dipti Amin and others
Plaintiff:
Daysean M. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Mahally et al
as 4:2019cv01112
Defendant:
Giselle Malet, Ransome, Lawrence P. Mahally and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Aldrigo Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMPKIN v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv01086
Petitioner:
TYRONE LAMPKIN
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Mahally et al
as 4:2019cv00419
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Lawrence P. Mahally and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kareem Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOTO v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv00780
Petitioner:
PEDRO SOTO
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUFFIN v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv00032
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY
Petitioner:
BRANDON A. RUFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2018cv01367
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY and JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
DARNELL DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Mahally et al
as 3:2018cv01637
Defendant:
CO Wilson, Dennis Gromel and Lawrence P. Mahally
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MAHALLY et al
as 5:2018cv01578
Petitioner:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
