Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02414
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Gonidakis et al v. Ohio Redistricting Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00773
Plaintiff: Michael Gonidakis, Mary Parker, Margaret Conditt and others
Intervenor Defendant: Ohio Redistricting Commission, Frank Larose, League of Women Voters of Ohio and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: The Honorable Reverend Lewis Macklin, Helen Youngblood, The Ohio Organizing Collaborative and others
Amicus Curiae: Center for Competitive Democracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
A. Philip Randolph Inst. of OH, et al v. Frank LaRose
as 20-4068
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOLI COLLINS, C. ELLEN CONNALLY, SARAH RIKLEEN and others
Defendant: FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio
Intervenor: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
A. Philip Randolph Inst. of OH, et al v. Frank LaRose
as 20-4063
Intervenor: OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOLI COLLINS, C. ELLEN CONNALLY, SARAH RIKLEEN and others
Amicus Curiae: CITY OF COLUMBUS, OH, CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH, CITY OF AKRON, OH and others
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secreatary of State of Ohio and FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio
A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, et al v. Larose We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01908
Plaintiff: Soli Collins, C. Ellen Connally, Sarah Rikleen and others
Defendant: Frank LaRose
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Ohio Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
League of Women Voters of Ohio et al v. LaRose
as 2:2020cv03843
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of Ohio, Carolyn E. Campbell, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Defendant: Frank LaRose
Intervenor Defendant: Ohio Republican Party, National Republican Congressional Committee, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of Ohio et al v. LaRose
as 2:2020cv01638
Plaintiff: Audrianna Victorian Rodriguez, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Hannah Tuvall and others
Defendant: Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. Larry Obhof, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3551
Petitioner / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, KATHRYN DEITSCH and others
Defendant: FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of the State of Ohio, LARRY HOUSEHOLDER, Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives and LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 18-4258
Petitioner / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Defendant / Appellee: GOVERNOR JOHN R. KASICH, In his official capacity, LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate, in his official capacity, JON HUSTED, Secretary of State of Ohio, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE OF OHIO and others
Intervenor: STEVE CHABOT, et al
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2018mc00116
Plaintiff: Linda Goldenhar, Beth Hutton, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Defendant: Larry Obhof, Ryan Smith and Jon Husted
Intervenor: Dave Joyce, Robert F, Bodi, Bill Johnson and others
Petitioner: Armond D Budish and Christopher Glassburn

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?