Cases 81 - 90 of 405
Wire Harness - Public Entities
as 2:2014cv10795
Plaintiff:
Richmond, City of
Defendant:
Delphi Automotive LLP, Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC, DENSO Corp. and others
James v. Lear Corporation and International Union et al
as 3:2014cv01831
Plaintiff:
David Lee James
Defendant:
Lear Corporation and International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and International (UAW) and Local Union 129
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sun Belt Transportation, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Sun Belt Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Lear Corporation and CRH North America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Reveille Trucking, Inc. v. Lear Corporation
as 4:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Reveille Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation et al v. The Carpenter Company
as 2:2014mc50168
Plaintiff:
Ace Foam Inc
Defendant:
The Carpenter Company and Flexible Foam Products, Inc.
Movant:
Lear Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drive Logistics Ltd. v. PBP Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2014cv10289
Plaintiff:
Drive Logistics Ltd.
Defendant:
PBP Logistics LLC, Piece By Piece Investments, Inc. and Lear Corporation
Cross_claimant:
Lear Corporation
Cross_defendant:
PBP Logistics LLC and Piece By Piece Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
