Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Leonel Martinez v. Attorney General of The United States of America, et al
as 24-6067
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Leonel Martinez v. Attorney General of The United States of America, et al
as 24-6058
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Martinez v. United States Office of the Attorney General et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Defendant:
United States Office of the Attorney General and Mr. Merrick Garland
Plaintiff:
Leonel Miranda Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonel Miranda v. Owensboro Police Department, et al
as 23-5801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONEL MARTINEZ MIRANDA, aka Leonel Miranda Martinez
Defendant / Appellee:
OWENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, MPD, OFFICER TIM CLOTHIER, in their individual and official capacities and others
Leonel MartinezIn re: Leonel Martinez
as 23-5751
Petitioner:
In re: LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
Leonel Martinez v. Lee County Adjustment Center, et al
as 23-5702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ, aka Leonel Martinez Miranda
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY ADJUSTMENT CENTER and MITCHELL BRANDENBURG, ADA Coordinator
Leonel MartinezIn re: Leonel Martinez
as 23-5185
Petitioner:
In re: LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ, aka Leonel Martinez Miranda
Leonel MartinezIn re: Leonel Martinez
as 23-5025
Petitioner:
In re: LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
Leonel Martinez
as 22-5461
Petitioner:
In re: LEONEL MIRANDA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
ANNA VALENTINE, Warden
Martinez v. Jordan
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Leonel Miranda Martinez
Defendant:
Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
