Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Thomas v. Court of Common Pleas Franklin County et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
James Leroy Thomas
Defendant:
Court of Common Pleas Franklin County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Honorable Shawn D. Meyers, P.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al
as 2:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Respondent:
J Morrison and P Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Rush v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 23-2177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY RUSH, a/k/a LEROY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
USA v. Leroy Joyner, Jr.
as 23-10189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEROY THOMAS JOYNER, JR.
RUSH v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv03796
Petitioner:
LARRY RUSH and LEROY THOMAS
Respondent:
JAMIE K. SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE S. KRASNER PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leroy Joyner, Jr.In re: Leroy Joyner, Jr.
as 21-13944
Petitioner:
In re: LEROY THOMAS JOYNER, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Leroy Thomas v. Generac Power Systems Incorporated, et al
as 21-12997
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS INCORPORATED and AARON P. JAGDFELD
THOMAS v. WARDEN SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2021cv00235
Petitioner:
JAMES LEROY THOMAS
Respondent:
PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and WARDEN SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Leroy Joyner, Jr.
as 21-12175
Defendant / Appellant:
LEROY THOMAS JOYNER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
