Cases 1 - 10 of 441
Fred Gonzales v. Rashida Jones, et al
as 24-7049
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Rashida Jones, Owner and CEO of MSNBC, Mark Thompson, Owner and CEO of CNN, Suzanne Scott, CEO of Fox and Friends News Network and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GONZALEZ-HOROWITZ
as 1:2023cv03494
Plaintiff:
LEWIS ROSS BROWN
Defendant:
BRENDA GONZALEZ-HOROWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. SHRENSKY
as 1:2023cv02275
Plaintiff:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant:
Lewis F Shrensky and LEWIS F. SHRENSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
