Cases filed in Mississippi
United States of America v. $21,480.00 United States Currency et al
as 1:2020cv00293
Defendant: Ten Rounds of .45 Caliber Aummunition, One Samsung Galaxy J7 Mobile Telephone, One Glock .45 Caliber, 30 Semi-Auto Pistol and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Ferguson et al v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff: Tim Ferguson , Melissa Ferguson and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant: Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. , LG Chem America, Inc. , LG Chem Michigan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saulters, et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00906
Plaintiff: William Saulters and Stacy Saulters
Defendant: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. , Tommy Richard Rayner , LG Electronics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saulters et al v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00390
Plaintiff: William Saulters and Stacy Saulters
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc. , Tommy Richard Rayner and John Doe Defendants 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00345
Plaintiff: The State of Mississippi
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation , AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc. , Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Comer et al v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00220
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, AEP Texas Central Company, Ameren Illinois Company and others
Plaintiff: Johanna Kisielewski, All Plaintiffs, Eric Haygood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saulters et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00071
Plaintiff: William Saulters and Stacy Saulters
Defendant: LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and Tommy Richard Rayner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff: Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?