Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Mehl v. LG Chem Ltd., et al.
as 23-3943
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN MEHL
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD. and DOES 1-50
PETITE v. LG CHEM, LTD
as 1:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kent Petite
Defendant:
LG Chem, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giorgio Quiniones v. LG Chem, Ltd.
as 23-15941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GIORGIO QUINIONES
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM, LTD.
The Ad Hoc Coalition of American SAP Producers v. United States
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
The Ad Hoc Coalition of American SAP Producers
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
LG Chem, Ltd.
Molecular Rebar Design, LLC et al v. LG Chem, Ltd., et al
as 1:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Molecular Rebar Design, LLC and Black Diamond Structures, LLC
Defendant:
LG Chem, Ltd.,, LG Energy Solution, Ltd.,, LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Erie Insurance Exchange v. HP Inc et al
as 1:2022cv03473
Plaintiff:
Erie Insurance Exchange
Counter Claimant:
HP Inc
Defendant:
LG Chem, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Sullivan v. LG Chem LTD, et al
as 22-1203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD and LG ENERGY SOLUTION MICHIGAN, INCORPORATED
Huntington v. Smoke City for Less, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv05014
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Huntington
Defendant:
Smoke City for Less LLC d/b/a Smoke City for Less, LG Chem LTD and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ryan Tieszen v. LG Chem Ltd.
as 22-8003
Respondent:
Ryan Tieszen
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., Vapah, Inc. and First Doe through Thirtieth Doe
Petitioner:
LG Chem Ltd.
Ryan Tieszen v. LG Chem Ltd.
as 22-1110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ryan Tieszen
Defendant:
eBay, Inc., Vapah, Inc. and First Doe through Thirtieth Doe
Defendant / Appellant:
LG Chem Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
