Cases 81 - 90 of 513
TIMM v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67768
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK TIMM
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHY v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67754
Plaintiff:
FLOYD T. SHY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SZYMKOWIAK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67816
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SZYMKOWIAK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMANUELE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67836
Plaintiff:
JOHN J EMANUELE, SR
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRATZ v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67807
Plaintiff:
RONALD BRATZ
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAZILE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67801
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BAZILE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILLMANN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67769
Plaintiff:
ELSIE R. GILLMANN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOHLS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67893
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS H. KOHLS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZUNKER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67894
Plaintiff:
EMIL H ZUNKER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. KEMPEN et al
as 2:2010cv67803
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEMPEN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
