Cases 1 - 10 of 16
James Griffith v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 22-1588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES F. GRIFFITH
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, MARK A. CABRERA, Doctor, DEBRA K. ELLINGTON, R.N. and others
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv04570
Defendant:
MICHELLE LAFLOWER, DR. PAUL TALBOT, PENDLETON FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Talbot et al
as 3:2019cv01023
Defendant:
Michelle Laflower, Pendleton Facility, Zatecky and others
Plaintiff:
Demajio J Ellis
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARKER v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv01280
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, M. LAFLOWER, P. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BARKER
Not Yet Classified:
Matthew Frederick Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFITH v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03416
Defendant:
MARK A. CABRERA, STACEY SCOTT, JESSICA WIGAL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv02644
Defendant:
RILEY GROOVER, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE, BARNS DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE (WITNESS), JOHN DOE (OFFICER) and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01323
Defendant:
LISA BERGESON, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
