Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00354
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hamel Jr et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04320
Plaintiff:
John Hamel Jr, John Jr Lyell, Nikiayh Johnson and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riggins et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03747
Plaintiff:
Christen Riggins, Harold White Jr, Charletta Hauser and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Krystalowich et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03462
Plaintiff:
Chris Krystalowich, Aaron Courtney, Anna Jordan and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01380
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00542
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
The Llama Group LLC v. John Does
as 2:2026cv01802
Plaintiff:
THE LLAMA GROUP LLC
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Love v. Tolle et al
as 2:2026cv00177
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Andrew J Tolle, Cpt Kyle Tritt, Melody Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
