Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Lollis v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02778
Petitioner:
Michael O. Lollis
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DePineda v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02555
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DePineda v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02181
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Mary Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pepper v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02145
Petitioner:
Darneau Versill Pepper
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dominguez v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv01576
Petitioner:
Francisco Dominguez
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lollis v. Archuleta et ali
as 1:2013cv01436
Petitioner:
Michael Lollis
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marquez v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv01936
Petitioner:
Elest Carlos Marquez
Respondent:
Joe Ortiz, Lou Archuleta and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2007cv01360
Petitioner:
Steve Yang
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle, vs. Archuleta, et al
as 1:2007cv01358
Petitioner:
Michael Doyle
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2007cv00834
Petitioner:
William Gilmore
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
