Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Dunlap v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jerard Dunlap
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch, Mark Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hysell v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv03074
Plaintiff:
Wesley-Thomas Hysell
Defendant:
Lou Archuleta, Ron Wager, Rick Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Depineda v. Archuleta, et al
as 13-1451
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL SESARIO DEPINEDA
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
DePineda v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02902
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey v. Werholtz, et al
as 13-1431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JAMES HARVEY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Deputy Director of DOC/Official Capacity, LOU ARCHULETA, CATHERINE SEGURA, Officer in her official capacity and individual capacity and others
Lollis v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02778
Petitioner:
Michael O. Lollis
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lollis v. Archuleta, et al
as 13-1413
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOLLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, FCF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
DePineda v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02555
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DePineda v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02181
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Mary Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pepper v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv02145
Petitioner:
Darneau Versill Pepper
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
