Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Dominguez v. Archuleta et al

as 1:2013cv01576
Petitioner:
Francisco Dominguez
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lollis v. Archuleta et ali

as 1:2013cv01436
Petitioner:
Michael Lollis
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murphy v. Archuleta, et al

as 10-1350
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE CLIFFORD MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and JOHN SUTHERS
Doyle v. Archuleta, et al

as 10-1013
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Andrews v. Archuleta, et al

as 09-1479
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD B. ANDREWS
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and STATE OF COLORADO
Huynh v. Archuleta, et al
as 09-1037
Petitioner - Appellant:
TAM HUYNH
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Nguyen v. Archuleta, et al

as 08-1337
Petitioner - Appellant:
THIEN H. NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Yang v. Archuleta, et al

as 07-1459
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE YANG
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, (Warden) and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marquez v. Ortiz et al

as 1:2007cv01936
Petitioner:
Elest Carlos Marquez
Respondent:
Joe Ortiz, Lou Archuleta and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2007cv01360
Petitioner:
Steve Yang
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.