Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Harvey v. Werholtz et al
as 1:2013cv01574
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel James Harvey, III
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Lou Archuleta, Catherine Segura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2013cv01576
Petitioner:
Francisco Dominguez
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lollis v. Archuleta et ali
as 1:2013cv01436
Petitioner:
Michael Lollis
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 1:2013cv00784
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Houston
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Michael Hancock, John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milligan v. Archuleta, et al
as 11-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MILLIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, CHARLES SANCHEZ, LANCE MIKLICH and others
Milligan v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Milligan
Defendant:
Lou Archuleta, Charles Sanchez, Lance Miklich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Archuleta, et al
as 10-1350
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE CLIFFORD MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and JOHN SUTHERS
Frazier v. Ortiz, et al
as 10-1133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director, CDOC, AL ESTEP, Warden, LCF, LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, LCF and others
Doyle v. Archuleta, et al
as 10-1013
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Andrews v. Archuleta, et al
as 09-1479
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD B. ANDREWS
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
