Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Jones v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2015cv01829
Petitioner:
Bernard Jones
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2015cv01580
Petitioner:
Derrick E. Turner
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of:Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Velarde v. Archuleta, et al
as 15-1250
Petitioner - Appellant:
WIGHTY W. VELARDE
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medina v. Archuleta
as 1:2015cv01334
Petitioner:
Joseph Medina
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Archuleta, et al
as 15-1209
Petitioner - Appellant:
JASON BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, Warden and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Vreeland v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch, Office of the Inspector General Colorado Department of Corrections, Richard Wren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2015cv01061
Petitioner:
John Trujillo
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrino v. Archuleta, et al
as 15-1160
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. PARRINO
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Lee v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2015cv00700
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Danielson-Grodin, et al v. Raemisch, et al
as 1:2014cv02704
Plaintiff:
Mary Danielson-Grodin, Matt Lincoln, John Demming and others
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Lou Archuleta, SCF Mailroom, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
