Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Frazier v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv02131
Plaintiff:
Keith Frazier
Defendant:
Joe Ortiz, Colorado Department of Corrections, Limon Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Ritter et al
as 1:2007cv02041
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Young
Defendant:
Bill Ritter, Jr., Lou Archuleta, Kelly Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv01975
Plaintiff:
Keith Frazier
Defendant:
Joe Ortiz, Colorado Department of Corrections, Limon Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv01936
Petitioner:
Elest Carlos Marquez
Respondent:
Joe Ortiz, Lou Archuleta and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yang v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2007cv01360
Petitioner:
Steve Yang
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle, vs. Archuleta, et al
as 1:2007cv01358
Petitioner:
Michael Doyle
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamlin v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv01058
Plaintiff:
JoJo Hamlin
Defendant:
Cheryl Smith, Curtis Robinette, Alan Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2007cv00834
Petitioner:
William Gilmore
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2007cv00702
Petitioner:
Thien H. Nguyen
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Cohen et al
as 1:2007cv00583
Plaintiff:
Steven Lopez Chavez
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Cohen, Hays, Susan Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
