Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Thomas v. Houser et al
as 3:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Curtis Thomas
Defendant:
Morris Houser, Louis Folino, Sgt. Kleno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PELZER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00074
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPT. LOUIS FOLINO, S.C.I. GREENE SECUITY THREAT GROUP MANAGMENT UNIT and others
Plaintiff:
CAINE PELZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PELZER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2020cv00051
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, MICHAEL CLARK, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CAINE PELZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HAMMOND v. KRAK et al
as 2:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND
Defendant:
ROBERT M. KRAK, LOUIS FOLINO, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EXUM v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv05193
Petitioner:
ALFONSO EXUM
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITENIGHT v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00620
Petitioner:
SHAWN WHITENIGHT
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, KATHLEEN KANE and JEFFERY BURKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REID-DOUGLAS et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID-DOUGLAS, THOMAS SCOTT and DALIYL MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAMES BARNACLE , DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTRO v. SUPERINTENDENT GLUNT et al
as 3:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
ADALBERTO CASTRO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GLUNT, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEARIN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, CARLA SWARTZ, ROBERT DIETZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
