Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION v. BROADCOM CORPORATION
as 1:2013mc00219
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent:
BROADCOM CORPORATION
Intervenor:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
LSI CORPORATION et al v. FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD.
as 1:2012mc00508
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS, INC.
Respondent:
FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
LSI CORPORATION et al v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2012mc00499
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Respondent:
PANASONIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
LSI CORPORATION et al v. FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 1:2012mc00457
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEM INCORPORATED
Respondent:
FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY , FUNAI CORPORATION INCORPORATED , P&F USA INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
LSI CORPORATION et al v. GORO SEKI, et al.,
as 1:2012mc00448
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Respondent:
GORO SEKI, MASAKI MORI, KAZUAKI ONISHI and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
LSI CORPORATION et al v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2012mc00436
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Respondent:
ACER INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN AUDIOVISUAL COMPONENTS AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME
as 1:2012mc00368
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS, INC.
Respondent:
GORO SEKI
In Re IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USING TUNGSTEN METALLIZATION AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
as 1:2008mc00709
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS, INC.
Respondent:
EMPLOYEES OF ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
