Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GRENKE v. MILES et al
as 3:2025cv00105
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
LT. MILES, JOHNSTOWN DOC/CCC PA, DIRECTOR HOWSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. Close, et al
as 25-1354
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
CLOSE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY and others
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Elijah WeirIn re: Elijah Weir
as 21-1955
Respondent:
BARRY R. SMITH, "Superintendant" at SCI-Houtzdale facility, B. J. SOLOMAN, "Deputy-Superintendant" at SCIHoutzdale, JOEL BARROWS, "Major Officer" at SCI-Houtzdale and others
Petitioner:
In re: ELIJAH WEIR
Williams v. Moore et al (INMATE 2)
as 5:2021cv00370
Defendant:
Sgt. Ray, Lt. Brown, B. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Moore et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Defendant:
Sgt. Moore, Sgt. Ray, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEIR v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH WEIR
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, BRIAN KOVAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY et al
as 1:2019cv00241
Defendant:
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CO MCKOY, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ALEXANDER WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrea v. SC Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv04018
Plaintiff:
Heyward McCrea
Defendant:
SC Department of Corrections, Willie L Eagleton, J Bethea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
