Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MARSHALL v. GARDENER et al
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL
Defendant:
GARDENER, BOGGS, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Crow, et al
as 21-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTI QUICK, Chief of Security, MARK KNUTSON, Director Designee ODOC, MR. BENEFIELD, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Rankin Bey v. Singleton et al
as 5:2021ct03040
Defendant:
Warden Shanticia Hawkins, Unit Manager Mullian, Assist. Warden Shirley Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dove v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00551
Defendant:
C.O. Kopp, A. Roselli-Hughes, LT # Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2019cv00321
Defendant:
STEPHEN HUNT, DANIEL BEDWELL, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JASPER L. FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel Giles
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDMOND v. GARDNER
as 1:2017cv00187
Defendant:
LT. GARDNER
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Defendant:
CLOE, T. AARON COX, CASSANDRA FEASTER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Annucci et al
as 9:2015cv00665
Plaintiff:
Eon Shepherd
Defendant:
Annucci, Superintendent Smith, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Gardner et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
Shareef K. Merritt
Defendant:
Lt. Gardner , Cpl. McLoyd , Cpl. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
