Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Stooksbury v. Ross
as 3:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
Robert T Stooksbury, Jr
Defendant:
Michael L Ross, LTR Properties, Inc, VPI Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Windriver Investments, LLC v. LTR Properties, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Windriver Investments, LLC
Defendant:
LTR Properties, Inc., Athena of SC, LLC , RPL Properties, LLC and others
Receiver:
Sterling P Owen, IV
Cross_claimant:
Sterling P Owen, IV
Cross_defendant:
Athena of SC, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Sterling P Owen, IV
Counter_defendant:
Windriver Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Robert Stooksbury, Jr. v. Michael Ross, et al
as 12-5739
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. ROSS, dba Rarity Pointe Realty, dba Rarity Reality, LTR PROPERTIES, INC., PPL PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Defendant:
GREGORY BAKER, et al
STOOKSBURY v. ROSS et al
as 9:2012mc80647
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL L. ROSS, LTR PROPERTIES, INC., RPL PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Receiver:
STERLING P. OWEN, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
STOOKSBURY v. ROSS et al
as 9:2012mc80645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL L. ROSS, LTR PROPERTIES, INC., RPL PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Receiver:
STERLING P. OWEN, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
First State Financial, Inc v. LTR Properties, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
First State Financial, Inc
Defendant:
LTR Properties, Inc and Michael L Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stooksbury v. Ross et al
as 3:2009cv00498
Plaintiff:
Robert T Stooksbury, Jr, Robert T Stooksbury, Jr and Robert T Stooksbury, Jr
Defendant:
Michael L Ross, LTR Properties, Inc, RPL Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
