Cases 51 - 56 of 56
ELAN PHARMA INTERNATIONAL LTD. et al v. LUPIN LIMITED et al
as 2:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
ELAN PHARMA INTERNATIONAL LTD. and FOURNIER LABORATORIES IRELAND LTD.
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS,INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv06261
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and LUPIN LIMITED
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SEPRACOR INC. et al v. LUPIN LIMITED et al
as 3:2007cv05265
Plaintiff:
SEPRACOR INC. and UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
IN RE: DESLORATADINE PATENT LITIGATION - MDL1851
as 3:2007cv03930
Plaintiff:
SCHERING CORPORATION, SCHERING CORPORATION and SCHERING CORPORATION
Defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Counter Claimant:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., ORGENUS PHARMA, INC. and others
Counter Defendant:
SCHERING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al v. LUPIN LIMITED et al
as 3:2007cv02896
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al v. LUPIN LIMITED et al
as 2:2007cv00247
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED, LUPIN LIMITED, LUPIN LIMITED and others
Counter Claimant:
LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Counter Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
