Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Judd v. Rasier, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01429
Defendant:
UBER Technologies, Inc,, Rasier, LLC, Yainier Chirino Viart and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Adam Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson et al v. Abeyneh et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Victoria Jones Johnson and Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Kidus Abeyneh and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01393
Defendant:
Victoria Jones Johnson, Lyft, Inc., Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hooks vs Lopez-Rivero, et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Antonay Arnetta Hooks
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Jose Luis Lopez-Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
State of Nevada, Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation ex. rel. Chagolla v. Lyft, Inc.,
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada, Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation ex. rel. Chagolla
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Woods et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Estate of Romualdo Barrientos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Chipman v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
James Chipman
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and United Financial Casualty Company (Progressive Insurance Company)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods
Defendant:
Melinda Hotchkins and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00805
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
