Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03111
Plaintiff:
Latoya Smith
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company et al
as 8:2019cv01273
Defendant:
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company (NE), State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Comapny and others
Plaintiff:
Latoya Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Hollie et al v. Vaughn et al
as 4:2019cv00524
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Vincent Henry, Austin O'Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Hollie, Latoya Smith and Carol Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 5:2018cv05184
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Latoya Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollie et al v. City of Bryan et al
as 4:2017cv03339
Defendant:
City of Bryan, Brazos County, Justin Seelig and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Hollie and Carol Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02816
Plaintiff:
Latoya Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
i: a Man; Negus Kwame Fahim Asiel-Dey v. Phelan Hallinan Diamond Jones Pllc et al
as 1:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
i: a Man; Negus Kwame Fahim Asiel-Dey
Defendant:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, PLLC, Tom Sears, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
