Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Frazier v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00766
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Thompkins, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00584
Defendant:
Marshall, Johnson, Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Lafayette Woods, Jr, Greg Kerstein and others
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00510
Defendant:
Thompkins, Hudson, Judy Browley and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Lafayette Woods, Jr and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Stanley James, Gary McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Tadlock et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Cymber Tadlock, S Kyle Hunter, Lafayette Woods, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Woods
as 4:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Bart A Kennedy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
