Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Lal Bhatia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60455
Petitioner:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lal Bhatia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60281
Petitioner:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lal Bhatia v. USA, et al
as 16-60076
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, an entity, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Bhatia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
United States of America, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bhatia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
United States of America, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lal Bhatia v. Eric Holder, et al
as 14-60899
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons and VANCE LAUGHLIN, Warden, Adams County Correctional Center, Natchez, Mississippi
Lal Bhatia v. DHS, et al
as 14-60780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
