Cases 41 - 50 of 80
USA v. Eduardo Pompa
as 15-41175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO LUIS POMPA, also known as Lalo
Irina Giovanno, et al v. Louis Fabec, et al
as 15-11889
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IRINA GIOVANNO and ANDREY SHUMILOV
Defendant - Appellant:
LOUIS FABEC and LALO SCROLLING MEDIA, LLC
Castle Point National Ins Co. v. Phillip Biaga
as 15-10224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CASTLE POINT NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, formerly known as SUA Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellant:
EVERADO CHUCA LALO, JR.
USA v. Alberto Avendano-Vasquez
as 15-10950
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO AVENDANO-VASQUEZ, a.k.a. Alberto Demetrio Avendano-Vasquez, a.k.a. Lalo
USA v. Jerardo Garcia
as 14-11289
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JERARDO SALCEDO GARCIA, also known as Lalo
US v. Gerardo Rodriguez-Aragon
as 14-4791
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GERARDO RODRIGUEZ-ARAGON, a/k/a Lalo
Soto et al v. Cafe Lalo, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07833
Plaintiff:
Sierra Soto , Kimberly Bechtold , Michelle Butler and others
Defendant:
Cafe Lalo, Inc., Haim Lalo and Daniel Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lan Rinco, LLC et al v. Castillo
as 1:2014cv23506
Plaintiff:
Lan Rinco, LLC , Ha Rinco, LLC , Lalo Rinco, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amy Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASTLE POINT NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BIAGAS, et al
as 5:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
CASTLE POINT NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PHILLIP SEAN BIAGAS, DANNEL ESTRADA, EVERADO CHUCA LALO, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Barrett-O'Neill v. LALO, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lynda Barrett-O'Neill
Defendant:
LALO, LLC and C.T. Franchising Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
