Cases 1 - 10 of 594
Kevin SouffrantIn re: Kevin Souffrant
as 24-1635
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN SOUFFRANT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
MAK Development LLC et al v. City of Lincoln, Nebraska et al
as 4:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
MAK Development LLC A Nebraska Limited Liability Company doing business as Michael House and Michael Corrado
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Nebraska and Lincoln-Lancaster County Planning Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Peralta v. District Attorney Lancaster County, et al
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PERALTA
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, BRADLEY BOOHER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Welch v. Officer Wooster #1863 et al
as 4:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Officer Wooster #1863, Officer Barone #1853, Lancaster County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CULBRETH v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
DOUGQUAN J. CULBRETH, JR.
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, LPN. (JANE DOE) WILLIAMS and LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
