Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund et al v. Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv05774
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and Will County Local 174 Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Masonry Institute et al v. Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01764
Plaintiff:
Masonry Institute , Bricklayers Local 21 Pension Fund , District Council Training Center Fund and others
Defendant:
Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv09080
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice & Trainee Program Fund
Defendant:
Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Laborers' Pension and Laborers' Welfare Fund for the Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago Vicinity et al v. Landmark Construction Company
as 1:2012cv06570
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension and Laborers' Welfare Fund for the Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago Vicinity , James S. Jorgensen and Landmark Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Laborers' Pension Fund, et al., v. Landmark Construction Service, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01605
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension Fund , Laborers' Welfare Fund of the Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers' District Council of Chicago and Vicinity and James S. Jorgensen
Defendant:
Landmark Construction Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
