Cases 1 - 10 of 373
Harry Langdon v. Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.
as 2:2024cv06941
Plaintiff:
Harry Langdon
Defendant:
Hollywood Unlocked, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Novalpina Capital Partners I Gp S.A.R.L v. Read, et al.
as 24-4835
Respondent:
TOBIAS READ and MICHAEL LANGDON
Intervenor:
TREO ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC AND TREO NOAL GP
Petitioner:
NOVALPINA CAPITAL PARTNERS I GP S.A.R.L
Combined Insurance Company of America v. Langdon et al
as 6:2024cv01105
Defendant:
Miles Combs, Kelly Langdon, Kelly Combs and others
Plaintiff:
Combined Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Rosado v. Langdon et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Rosado, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Langdon, Cindy Hayes, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
LANGDON v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2024cv20782
Plaintiff:
DIANE LANGDON
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Warden William Langdon, III
as 0:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
David Andrew Bowers
Respondent:
Warden William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Stirling et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Arthur William Macon
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Corrections and William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
