Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Halliburton, et al
as 13-614
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
JOY HALLIBURTON-, LUZ LORA, R JUDITH DEMCHAK and others
Halliburton et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00832
Plaintiff:
Joy L Halliburton , Luz Lora , Judith Demchak and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Halliburton et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
Joy L Halliburton , Luz Lora , Judith Demchak and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
USA v. Larry Dauenhauer
as 12-30132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY JOHN DAUENHAUER
Lizotte v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv10181
Plaintiff:
Larry John Lizotte
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Larry Little, Jr. v. D. Sisto, et al
as 12-55049
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY JOHN LITTLE, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO and JERRY BROWN
Jack v. Denney
as 4:2011cv01220
Petitioner:
Larry John Jack, Sr
Respondent:
Larry Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bruno v. Castle et al
as 6:2010cv01707
Plaintiff:
Larry John Bruno, Sr
Defendant:
Marilyn C Castle, Alan Haney and Thomas Wayne Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al v. Bio Medical Applications of Louisiana L L C et al
as 5:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Ellis, Melba Collins, Larry Johns and others
Defendant:
Bio Medical Applications of Louisiana L L C and Continental Casualty Company
Receiver:
Lola Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Creal et al v. Chase Bank, USA, N.A.
as 1:2009cv00690
Plaintiff:
Russell Shane Creal, Karen R. Creal, Betty L. Gunter and others
Defendant:
Chase Bank, USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461 Homeowners Loan Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
