Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Al-Ali v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The et al
as 2:2018cv00845
Defendant:
Sean Reyes, Third District Court of Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff:
Jihad Al-Ali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gordon Beh , Huber Indus Aun , Robert Oslar and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paoloni, et al v. Goldstein, et al
as 1:2001cv00275
Plaintiff:
Dominick Paoloni , Investor Protection Services, Inc. , Nathaniel P. Jarvis and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ieracitano , Blue Paper, Inc. , Gary Hoskie and others
Interested_party:
Larry K. Griffis
Receiver:
Scott A. Elk
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moore Broadway Kids, et al v. Okla.Commission for Human Svcs, et al
as 09-6092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOORE BROADWAY KIDS, an Oklahoma corporation, KEONA SLEMP, MITCHELL SLEMP and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA COMMISSION FOR HUMAN SERVICES, HOWARD HENDRICK, as Director of Oklahoma Department for Human Services, MICHAEL FAIRLESS, individually and as Inspector General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore Broadway Kids et al v. Oklahoma Commission for Human Services et al
as 5:2008cv00426
Plaintiff:
Moore Broadway Kids, Leona Slemp, Mitchell Slemp and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Commission for Human Services, Howard Hendrick, Michael Fairless and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
