Cases
Larry Bell, Sr. v. Cheryl Feuerstein, et al
as 23-35497
Plaintiff / Appellant: LARRY LYDELL BELL, Sr., and any other same like situated circumstances
Defendant / Appellee: CHERYL J. FEUERSTEIN, Personal Representative of Estate, RAYLYNNA J. PETERSON, MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY and others
Bell v. Feuerstein et al
as 3:2022cv01688
Plaintiff: Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Defendant: Cheryl J. Feuerstein, Raylynna J. Peterson, Merchants Bonding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Bell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00075
Plaintiff: Larry Lydell Bell, Sr
Defendant: Cheryl J. Feuerstein, Merchants Bonding Company and Raylynna J Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell, Sr. v. Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01628
Petitioner: Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Respondent: Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax: Lynn David Larsen
503) 947-4791 (fax: Samuel A. Kubernick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Nooth et al
as 2:2011cv01222
Plaintiff: Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Defendant: Joe Cap, Bill Doman, M. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Multnomah County Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial District in Oregon, et al
as 6:2008cv00928
Plaintiff: Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Defendant: Multnomah County Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial District in Oregon,, Janice R Wilson and Multnomah County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Bell, Sr. v. Bernie Giusto
as 08-35416
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY LYDELL BELL, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee: BERNIE GIUSTO
Bell v. Giusto
as 3:2007cv01804
Petitioner: Larry Lydell Bell, Sr.
Respondent: Bernie Giusto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?