Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Crews v. Tuck et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01663
Plaintiff: Kevin Crews
Defendant: Loxcil B Tuck, Chief Dennis Reno, Lieutenant Larry Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant / Appellee: SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant: FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, GDC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Palmer, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES PALMER and MICHELLE PALMER
Plaintiff: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee: SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH R. LISTER
Defendant: FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, BARRY J. CADDEN and others
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor: STATE OF TENNESSEE
Norris, et al v. Specialty Surgery Center, PLLC, et al
as 17-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOCELYN KAE NORRIS
Plaintiff: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee: SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, PLLC, d/b/a Specialty Surgery Center, KENNETH R. LISTER and KENNETH LISTER, M.D., P.C.
Defendant: LINDA LUI LUONG, FULLERTON ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC and others
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY, EMORY CLINIC, INC., VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and others
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center and LYNNE F. RILEY
Intervenor: STATE OF TENNESSEE
In Re: Larry Rice
as 16-2363
Petitioner: In re: Larry Rice
Rice v. Unifirst Corporation a/d/b/a Uniclean Cleanroom Services
as 1:2015cv10397
Plaintiff: Larry Rice
Defendant: Unifirst Corporation a/d/b/a Uniclean Cleanroom Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Federal Land Bank of Omaha et al
as 8:2015cv00026
Defendant: Agri-Bank, FCB and Federal Land Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff: Larry Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ranger Fuel Corporation v. Larry Rice
as 15-1012
Petitioner: RANGER FUEL CORPORATION
Respondent: LARRY RICE and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Austin et al v. Insight Health Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv13504
Plaintiff: Gladys G. Austin , Richard Blankenship , Cheryl Brogan and others
Defendant: Insight Health Corp. , Image Guided Pain Management, P.C. , John M. Mathis , M.D. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: Ameridose LLC , ARL Bio Pharma, Inc., Barry J Cadden and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Insight Health Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larson v. Wills We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01085
Plaintiff: Lawrence Oliver Larson, Jr.
Defendant: Harry Wills, William Stacy and Larry Rice
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?