Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Nelson v. Harry et al
as 4:2025cv00696
Plaintiff:
Brian Nelson
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Erin Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, LAURELL HARRY, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruben Craig, III v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 25-1690
Plaintiff:
RUBEN RICHARD CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, Secretary of Corrections and DAVID DUNN BAUER, Contract Chaplain SCI Phoenix
KONIAS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2025cv00469
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. KONIAS, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, TINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Harry et al
as 3:2025cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jesse Brown
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Wenerowicz, Jennifer McClelland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2025cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
Governor Josh Shapiro and Secretary LAUREL HARRY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
David Rosario v. John Wetzel, et al
as 25-1612
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, DR. LAUREL HARRY, DEPUTY SECRETARY TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Pittman v. Shapiro et al
as 3:2025cv00552
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Isham Pittman
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro and Laurel Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. HARRY et al
as 3:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
ALBERT E MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, ERIC TICE, C PASQUALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. HARRY et al
as 2:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MOTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE M. LITTLE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
