Cases 1 - 10 of 72
COIT v. HARRY et al
as 3:2025cv00183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY and M. ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2025cv00630
Plaintiff:
STEFON JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2025cv00100
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, LAURELL HARRY, DORINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KONIAS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2025cv00469
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. KONIAS, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, TINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2025cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO and LAUREL HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. HARRY et al
as 3:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
ALBERT E MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, ERIC TICE, C PASQUALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. HARRY et al
as 2:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MOTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE M. LITTLE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. HARRY et al
as 1:2025cv00059
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEARS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2024cv01620
Defendant:
BROADWATER, CHRISTOPHER DISALVO, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Plaintiff:
DAARON ANTHONY SHEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Foley v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Defendant:
Laurel Harry and Lisa Graves
Plaintiff:
Taylor Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
