Cases 1 - 10 of 1,854
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adkins v. IMerge Financial et al
as 2:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Vy Adkins
Defendant:
IMerge Financial and Five Lakes Law Group, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Rahaman [E-filer] v. Boedeker Law P.C.
as 2:2024cv10825
Plaintiff:
Joy Rahaman [E-filer]
Defendant:
Boedeker Law P.C.
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
London v. River Rouge PD et al
as 2:2024cv10754
Plaintiff:
Randall Tremayne London
Defendant:
River Rouge PD, Barton Morris Law Firm and Wayne, County of
Advocate Capital, Inc. v Law Offices of Steven Ibarra, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Advocate Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Law Offices of Steven Ibarra, Inc. and Steven Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
