Cases
Raymond Whitall v. Stephanie Phan, et al
as 21-16463
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHANIE TRAN PHAN, M.D., Primary Care Physician, CDC and Rehabilitation, A. NEWTON, Supervising R.N. II, Salinas Valley State Prison, MS. DOWLESS, Public Health Nurse, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Bryan Patterson v. USDC-CASF
as 20-72448
Not Classified By Court: C. BOURNE, M.D., LAW SAN FU, M.D., EDWARD BIROSONG, D.O. and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Petitioner: BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON
Whitall v. Phan et al
as 3:2019cv07696
Defendant: Reetika Kim Kumar, Law San Fu, Lawrence Gamboa and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Richard Whitall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Whitall v. Stephanie Phan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16397
Defendant: A. NEWTON, N. WALKER, ROGER L. MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: ELAINE CANTU, STEPHANIE TRAN PHAN, M.D., Primary Care Physician, CDCR, LAWRENCE GAMBOA, M.D., Chief Physician and Surgeon, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Bryan Patterson v. Thomas Zewert, et al
as 19-16266
Defendant / Appellee: LAWRENCE GAMBOA, M.D., FERNANDO TUVERA, M.D., M. JANSEN, Appeal Coordinator and others
Defendant: RANDULF FABUIZA, N.P.
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRYAN DAMON PATTERSON
Patterson v. Zewert et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv06914
Plaintiff: Bryan Damon Patterson
Defendant: Thomas Zewert, Fernando Tuvera, Law San Fu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Zewert et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02446
Plaintiff: Bryan Damon Patterson
Defendant: Thomas Zewert, Fernando Tuvera, Law San Fu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?