Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Hall v. Kelly
as 23-60456
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Hall
Respondent / Appellee:
Lawrence Kelly, Warden
Kirby Tate v. Earnestine Starks, et al
as 13-60866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRBY TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
EARNESTINE STARKS, Sergeant, Unit 29-B, in Her Individual and Official Capacity, REGINA CAPLERS, Lieutenant, Disciplinary Officer, in Her Official Capacity, RICKY SCOTT, CID Investigator, in His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Charlie Harris v. Lawrence Kelly
as 12-60734
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLIE HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, r
Joseph Jones v. Lawrence Kelly
as 12-60732
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH GLENN JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY
Donald Burton v. Jim Hood, et al
as 12-60725
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD KEITH BURTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JIM HOOD and LAWRENCE KELLY
Steven Hall v. Lawrence Kelly
as 12-60447
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Warden
William Cannon v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-60272
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CANNON
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary and CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Smith v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. First et al
as 4:2011cv00106
Petitioner:
Lonnie L. Jordan
Respondent:
Albert First, Lawrence Kelly and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Thorson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ERIC THORSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman and JIM HOOD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
