Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Hinkle et al
as 5:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Mina Woods
Defendant:
Robert Hinkle, Nathan Ronan and Lawton City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maples v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sedona Warren, Nathan Ronan, Austin Mahsetky and others
Plaintiff:
Joanna Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2018cv00558
Plaintiff:
Lebron Copeland
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Comanche County Facilities Authority , James T Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kemp v. Lawton City of
as 5:2017cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tony L Kemp
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Trenton Ulrich, Josh Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pae v. Lawton City of
as 5:2016cv01198
Plaintiff:
Chu H Pae
Defendant:
Lawton City of
Third_party_defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission, Doe, GE Money Bank and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Lawton City of
Counter_claimant:
Lawton City of
Counter_defendant:
Chu H Pae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2016cv00869
Plaintiff:
Margie M Robinson
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Chelsey L Gordon, Timothy T Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2015cv00614
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Nieves and Megal Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Albert Nease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
