Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ada City of et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00748
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Ada City of, Altus City of, Anadarko City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Woods v. Hinkle et al
as 5:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Mina Woods
Defendant:
Robert Hinkle, Nathan Ronan and Lawton City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawton City of v. Engie Services US Inc
as 5:2021cv00455
Defendant:
Engie Services US Inc and OpTerra Energy Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Lawton City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maples v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sedona Warren, Nathan Ronan, Austin Mahsetky and others
Plaintiff:
Joanna Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
