Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sonohm Licensing, LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02148
Defendant:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sonohm Licensing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Anoto AB et al v. LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2016cv06209
Petitioner:
Anoto AB and Livescribe, Inc.
Respondent:
LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
Codec Technologies LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Codec Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. v. Epik Learning, LLC
as 3:2016cv04269
Plaintiff:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Epik Learning, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Manger v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01161
Plaintiff:
Pete J. Manger
Defendant:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. , John Barbour , William B. Chiasson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Long Corner Consumer Electronics LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
Long Corner Consumer Electronics LLC
Defendant:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Multiplayer Network Innovations, LLC v. LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Multiplayer Network Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bette R Grayson v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Bette R. Grayson
Defendant:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc., John Barbour and Raymond L. Arthur
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Farias v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Richard Farias
Defendant:
Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc., John Barbour and Raymond L. Arthur
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
