Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jose v. Maui Electric Company, Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jose, Chi Guyer, Krystal Cunningham and others
Defendant:
Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
ST. JAMES v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as 3:2018cv02143
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE ST. JAMES
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lazo et al v. M&G Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Sergio Lazo , Robert Mejia , Ricky Lee Vasquez and others
Defendant:
M&G Corporation, Integrity Mechanical Specialists, LLC, Richard Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JAMES v. USA
as 1:2015cv00042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LEE CONDER JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Logsdon-James v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00845
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Laurie Lee Logsdon-James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
USA v. Lee Jame
as 12-15953
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE CONDER JAMES
JAMES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43974
Plaintiff:
LEE A. JAMES, SR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
USA v. Rashid Bradley
as 10-3106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RASHID BRADLEY, aka Thomas Lee aka James Rogers
Armstrong et al v. Tyson Foods et al
as 6:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Rusty Armstrong, Rusty Armstrong, Diane Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lee A. James v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-60837
Plaintiff:
Lee A. James
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
