Cases 1 - 10 of 38
McMillen v. Patterson et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Micki McMillen
Defendant:
Michael Patterson, Adam Cook, Dominic Neisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Lee County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
Lee County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. Union County Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Union County Mississippi, Sheriff Jimmy Edwards, Lee County Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wade v. Lee County, Mississippi
as 1:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Havana Maria Wade
Defendant:
Lee County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Lansdell v. Lee Miller, et al
as 20-60143
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE MILLER, In His Individual Capacity and LEE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DAVIS LANSDELL
Lee County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45160
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lee County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lee County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00045
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lee County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lansdell v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
John David Lansdell
Defendant:
Lee Miller and Lee County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. The City of Tupelo, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Vincent Edwards
Defendant:
The City of Tupelo, Mississippi, Lee County, Mississippi, Ramierre Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
