Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Cox v. Krpin, et al.
as 24-1224
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE COX, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN KRPIN, Doctor and MULE CREEK PRISON
Cox v. Pfeiffer
as 23-4113
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVERETT LEE COX
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04302
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tommy Cox v. Cathelene Robinson, et al
as 23-11201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY LEE COX
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHELENE TINE ROBINSON, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 100, Individually, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S) 1 THROUGH 100, Each in their official capacity as Fulton County Chief Deputy Clerk, Assistant Chief Deputy Clerk(s), and Clerk(s) whose true name, their office and residential address each are yet unknown and others
Everett Lee Cox v. Pfiffer
as 2:2023cv02018
Petitioner:
Everett Lee Cox
Respondent:
Pfiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03523
Plaintiff:
PERRY LEE COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jamey Lee Cox
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22253
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haughey-Cox et al v. Target Corporation
as 3:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Marolyn Kay Haughey-Cox and Allen Lee Cox
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
Cox v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv01998
Defendant:
Cathelene Robinson, Cathelene (Tina) Robinson, John and/or Jane Doe(s) 1 through 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
